4.6 Article

Circulation anomalies associated with interannual variation of early- and late-summer precipitation in Northeast China

Journal

SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 54, Issue 7, Pages 1095-1104

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11430-011-4173-6

Keywords

summer rainfall; Northeast China; interannual variation; cold vortex; western Pacific subtropical high; East Asian jet stream

Funding

  1. National Technology Support Project [2009BAC51B04, 2007BAC29B01]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-YW-220]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40575047, 40705036]
  4. China Meteorological Administration [CMATG2009MS01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Summer rainfall is vital for crops in Northeast China. In this study, we investigated large-scale circulation anomalies related to monthly summer rainfall in Northeast China using European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecast ERA-40 reanalysis data and monthly rainfall data from 79 stations in Northeast China. The results show that the interannual variation in rainfall over Northeast China is mainly dominated by a cold vortex in early summer (May-June) and by the East Asian summer monsoon in late summer (July-August). In early summer, corresponding to increased rainfall in Northeast China, an anomalous cyclonic anomaly tilted westward with height appears to the northwest and cold vortices occur frequently. In late summer, the rainfall anomaly is mainly controlled by a northward shift of the local East Asian jet stream in the upper troposphere and the northwest extension of the western Pacific subtropical high (WPSH) in the lower troposphere. The enhanced southwesterly anomaly in the west of the WPSH transports more moisture into Northeast China and results in more rainfall. In addition, compared with that in July, the rainfall in Northeast China in August is also influenced by a mid- and high-latitude blocking high over Northeast Asia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available