4.7 Article

Stereoselective interactions of chiral dipeptides on amylose based chiral stationary phases

Journal

SCIENCE CHINA-CHEMISTRY
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages 519-525

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11426-014-5239-z

Keywords

dipeptide enantiomers; amylose tris-(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate); chiral recognition mechanism; elution order; AutoDock 4.2.

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India [DST/INT/RFBR/P-147]
  2. Russian Foundation of Basic Research, Russia [RFBR 13-03-92692]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dipeptides are stereo-specifically involved in several biological functions that are challenging to separate enantiomerically. Elution order of enantiomers is an important issue in chiral chromatography. Amylose tris-(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) chiral stationary phase (CSP) is the best and most-widely-used CSP in chiral separations, but experimental data of enantiomeric separation of dipeptides on this CSP is lacking. Simulation studies were conducted to determine the order of elution and the chiral recognition mechanism of didpetides on this CSP. Results indicated that the docking energy of SR-enantiomers were higher than SS-antipodes. The range of docking energies for SR-enantiomers was -7.44 to -5.92 kcal/mol with CSP, but -7.15 to -5.87 kcal/mol for SS-stereoisomers. Therefore it is predicted that SS-enantiomer will elute first, followed by SR-antipode. Furthermore, hydrogen bondings, van der Waal's interactions and electrostatic interactions were observed among SR- and SS-enantiomers and chiral grooves of CSP. The number of hydrogen bonds was one in each enantiomer binding except S-Ala-R-Tyr, which contained two hydrogen bonds. No hydrogen bond was found in S-Ala-R-Trp, S-Leu-S-Trp, and S-Leu-S-Tyr dipeptides bindings. The chiral recognition mechanisms dictate different strengths of stereoselective bindings of the enantiomers on CSP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available