4.8 Review

Challenges for commercializing perovskite solar cells

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 361, Issue 6408, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aat8235

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91733301, 91433203, 61474049, 51502141, 21702069]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2015AA034601]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. Science and Technology Department of Hubei Province [2017AAA190]
  5. 111 Project [B07038]
  6. U.S. Office of Naval Research [N00014-17-1-2524]
  7. National 1000 Young Talents Award in China
  8. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [680-50-1511]
  9. Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship Program
  10. Global Frontier RD Program [NRF-2011-0031565]
  11. UNIST [1.180043.01]
  12. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0031565] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have witnessed rapidly rising power conversion efficiencies, together with advances in stability and upscaling. Despite these advances, their limited stability and need to prove upscaling remain crucial hurdles on the path to commercialization. We summarize recent advances toward commercially viable PSCs and discuss challenges that remain. We expound the development of standardized protocols to distinguish intrinsic and extrinsic degradation factors in perovskites. We review accelerated aging tests in both cells and modules and discuss the prediction of lifetimes on the basis of degradation kinetics. Mature photovoltaic solutions, which have demonstrated excellent long-term stability in field applications, offer the perovskite community valuable insights into clearing the hurdles to commercialization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available