4.8 Article

Comparative genomics reveals insights into avian genome evolution and adaptation

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 346, Issue 6215, Pages 1311-1320

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1251385

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. BGI
  2. Marie Curie International Incoming Fellowship [300837]
  3. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF94]
  4. Lundbeck Foundation [R52-A5062]
  5. Danish Council for Independent Research [10-081390]
  6. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  7. NIH [DP1OD000448]
  8. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/J010170/1, BB/J010170/2, BB/K008226/1, BB/K008226/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Villum Fonden [00007370] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. BBSRC [BB/J010170/2, BB/K008226/1, BB/J010170/1, BB/K008226/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Direct For Biological Sciences
  12. Division Of Environmental Biology [1241059] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  13. Direct For Biological Sciences
  14. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [0841821] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Birds are the most species-rich class of tetrapod vertebrates and have wide relevance across many research fields. We explored bird macroevolution using full genomes from 48 avian species representing all major extant clades. The avian genome is principally characterized by its constrained size, which predominantly arose because of lineage-specific erosion of repetitive elements, large segmental deletions, and gene loss. Avian genomes furthermore show a remarkably high degree of evolutionary stasis at the levels of nucleotide sequence, gene synteny, and chromosomal structure. Despite this pattern of conservation, we detected many non-neutral evolutionary changes in protein-coding genes and noncoding regions. These analyses reveal that pan-avian genomic diversity covaries with adaptations to different lifestyles and convergent evolution of traits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available