4.8 Article

Momentum sharing in imbalanced Fermi systems

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 346, Issue 6209, Pages 614-617

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1256785

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. Israel Science Foundation
  4. Chilean Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica
  5. French Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique
  6. French-American Cultural Exchange
  7. Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
  8. National Research Foundation of Korea
  9. UK's Science and Technology Facilities Council
  10. DOE, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics [DE-AC05-06OR23177]
  11. Division Of Physics
  12. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1307340] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  13. Division Of Physics
  14. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1205782, 1306418, 1306737, 1306137] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  15. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L005719/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  16. STFC [ST/L005719/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The atomic nucleus is composed of two different kinds of fermions: protons and neutrons. If the protons and neutrons did not interact, the Pauli exclusion principle would force the majority of fermions (usually neutrons) to have a higher average momentum. Our high-energy electron-scattering measurements using C-12, Al-27, Fe-56, and Pb-208 targets show that even in heavy, neutron-rich nuclei, short-range interactions between the fermions form correlated high-momentum neutron-proton pairs. Thus, in neutron-rich nuclei, protons have a greater probability than neutrons to have momentum greater than the Fermi momentum. This finding has implications ranging from nuclear few-body systems to neutron stars and may also be observable experimentally in two-spin-state, ultracold atomic gas systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available