4.8 Article

In utero undernourishment perturbs the adult sperm methylome and intergenerational metabolism

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 345, Issue 6198, Pages 785-+

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1255903

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.K. Medical Research Council
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. European Commission FP7, EpiGeneSys
  4. European Commission FP7, EpiHealth
  5. Pediatric Endocrine Society
  6. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH
  7. American Diabetes Association
  8. Graetz Foundation
  9. NIH [P30DK036836]
  10. Novartis Research Foundation
  11. BBSRC [BBS/E/B/0000S266, BBS/E/B/000C0402] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. MRC [MR/J001597/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  13. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25713040] Funding Source: KAKEN
  14. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/B/000C0402, BBS/E/B/0000S266] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. Medical Research Council [MR/J001597/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adverse prenatal environments can promote metabolic disease in offspring and subsequent generations. Animal models and epidemiological data implicate epigenetic inheritance, but the mechanisms remain unknown. In an intergenerational developmental programming model affecting F-2 mouse metabolism, we demonstrate that the in utero nutritional environment of F-1 embryos alters the germline DNA methylome of F-1 adult males in a locus-specific manner. Differentially methylated regions are hypomethylated and enriched in nucleosome-retaining regions. A substantial fraction is resistant to early embryo methylation reprogramming, which may have an impact on F-2 development. Differential methylation is not maintained in F-2 tissues, yet locus-specific expression is perturbed. Thus, in utero nutritional exposures during critical windows of germ cell development can impact the male germline methylome, associated with metabolic disease in offspring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available