Journal
SCIENCE
Volume 340, Issue 6133, Pages 707-711Publisher
AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1231566
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- German Science Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) through the Leibniz Program
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The possibility that market interaction may erode moral values is a long-standing, but controversial, hypothesis in the social sciences, ethics, and philosophy. To date, empirical evidence on decay of moral values through market interaction has been scarce. We present controlled experimental evidence on how market interaction changes how human subjects value harm and damage done to third parties. In the experiment, subjects decide between either saving the life of a mouse or receiving money. We compare individual decisions to those made in a bilateral and a multilateral market. In both markets, the willingness to kill the mouse is substantially higher than in individual decisions. Furthermore, in the multilateral market, prices for life deteriorate tremendously. In contrast, for morally neutral consumption choices, differences between institutions are small.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available