4.8 Article

Repeated Cortico-Striatal Stimulation Generates Persistent OCD-Like Behavior

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 340, Issue 6137, Pages 1234-1239

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1234733

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) [K08MH087718]
  2. Louis V. Gerstner, Jr., Scholars Program
  3. Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research
  4. Gray Matters Foundation
  5. Leon Levy Foundation
  6. Brain and Behavior Research Foundation NARSAD Young Investigator Award
  7. NIMH [K01MH099371]
  8. Sackler Institute
  9. NARSAD
  10. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, NIH, California Institute for Regenerative Medicine
  11. Defense Advance Research Projects Agency The Reorganization and Plasticity to Accelerate Injury Recovery (REPAIR) Program
  12. NIH [R01 MH096274]
  13. Hope for Depression Research Foundation
  14. International Mental Health Research Organization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) circuit dysregulation is correlated with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), causation cannot be tested in humans. We used optogenetics in mice to simulate CSTC hyperactivation observed in OCD patients. Whereas acute orbitofrontal cortex (OFC)-ventromedial striatum (VMS) stimulation did not produce repetitive behaviors, repeated hyperactivation over multiple days generated a progressive increase in grooming, a mouse behavior related to OCD. Increased grooming persisted for 2 weeks after stimulation cessation. The grooming increase was temporally coupled with a progressive increase in light-evoked firing of postsynaptic VMS cells. Both increased grooming and evoked firing were reversed by chronic fluoxetine, a first-line OCD treatment. Brief but repeated episodes of abnormal circuit activity may thus set the stage for the development of persistent psychopathology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available