4.8 Article

Fine Tuning of Craniofacial Morphology by Distant-Acting Enhancers

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 342, Issue 6157, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1241006

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDCR FaceBase grant [U01DE020060]
  2. National Human Genome Research Institute [R01HG003988, U54HG006997]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation
  4. F32 NIH/National Institute of General Medical Sciences National Research Service Award [GM105202]
  5. NIH [U54HG006997, 1R01DE021708, 1R01DE01963, 1U01DE020054, R01HG003991]
  6. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [238992-11]
  7. UK Medical Research Council
  8. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
  9. NIH
  10. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  11. MRC [MC_U127561093, MC_PC_U127561093] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. Medical Research Council [MC_U127561093, MC_PC_U127561093] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The shape of the human face and skull is largely genetically determined. However, the genomic basis of craniofacial morphology is incompletely understood and hypothesized to involve protein-coding genes, as well as gene regulatory sequences. We used a combination of epigenomic profiling, in vivo characterization of candidate enhancer sequences in transgenic mice, and targeted deletion experiments to examine the role of distant-acting enhancers in craniofacial development. We identified complex regulatory landscapes consisting of enhancers that drive spatially complex developmental expression patterns. Analysis of mouse lines in which individual craniofacial enhancers had been deleted revealed significant alterations of craniofacial shape, demonstrating the functional importance of enhancers in defining face and skull morphology. These results demonstrate that enhancers are involved in craniofacial development and suggest that enhancer sequence variation contributes to the diversity of human facial morphology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available