4.8 Article

Large-Pore Apertures in a Series of Metal-Organic Frameworks

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 336, Issue 6084, Pages 1018-1023

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1220131

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. BASF SE (Ludwigshafen, Germany)
  2. Center for Gas Separations Relevant to Clean Energy Technologies, an Energy Frontier Research Center (EFRC)
  3. DOE, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (U.S. DOE-BES) [DE-SC0001015]
  4. U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Threat Reduction Agency [HDTRA11-1-0018]
  5. Non-equilibrium Energy Research Center, EFRC
  6. U.S. DOE-BES [DE-SC0000989]
  7. World Class University [R-31-2008-000-10055-0]
  8. NIH-National Center for Research Resources [CJX1-443835-WS-29646]
  9. NSF [CHE-0722519]
  10. Swiss National Science Foundation
  11. Spanish Ministry of Education
  12. National Research Foundation of Korea [R31-2012-000-10055-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report a strategy to expand the pore aperture of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) into a previously unattained size regime (>32 angstroms). Specifically, the systematic expansion of a well-known MOF structure, MOF-74, from its original link of one phenylene ring (I) to two, three, four, five, six, seven, nine, and eleven (II to XI, respectively), afforded an isoreticular series of MOF-74 structures (termed IRMOF-74-I to XI) with pore apertures ranging from 14 to 98 angstroms. All members of this series have non-interpenetrating structures and exhibit robust architectures, as evidenced by their permanent porosity and high thermal stability (up to 300 degrees C). The pore apertures of an oligoethylene glycol-functionalized IRMOF-74-VII and IRMOF-74-IX are large enough for natural proteins to enter the pores.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available