4.8 Review

The Geological Record of Ocean Acidification

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 335, Issue 6072, Pages 1058-1063

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1208277

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF OCE [10-32374]
  2. Past Global Changes (PAGES)
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/F017383/1, NE/H023852/1, NE/H017453/1, NE/H017518/1, NE/H017356/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. NERC [NE/H023852/1, NE/H017453/1, NE/H017356/1, NE/H017518/1, NE/F017383/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. ICREA Funding Source: Custom
  6. Directorate For Geosciences
  7. Division Of Earth Sciences [1023724] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Directorate For Geosciences
  9. Division Of Earth Sciences [0807744] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  11. Directorate For Geosciences [1032374] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  13. Directorate For Geosciences [1357665, 1031995] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ocean acidification may have severe consequences for marine ecosystems; however, assessing its future impact is difficult because laboratory experiments and field observations are limited by their reduced ecologic complexity and sample period, respectively. In contrast, the geological record contains long-term evidence for a variety of global environmental perturbations, including ocean acidification plus their associated biotic responses. We review events exhibiting evidence for elevated atmospheric CO2, global warming, and ocean acidification over the past similar to 300 million years of Earth's history, some with contemporaneous extinction or evolutionary turnover among marine calcifiers. Although similarities exist, no past event perfectly parallels future projections in terms of disrupting the balance of ocean carbonate chemistry-a consequence of the unprecedented rapidity of CO2 release currently taking place.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available