4.8 Article

Hierarchical Genetic Organization of Human Cortical Surface Area

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 335, Issue 6076, Pages 1634-1636

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1215330

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging [AG022381, AG018386, AG018384, AG022982, AG031224]
  2. National Institute of Drug Abuse [DA029475]
  3. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NS056883]
  4. National Center for Research Resources [P41-RR14075, BIRN002, U24 RR021382]
  5. National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering [EB006758]
  6. National Center for Alternative Medicine [RC1 AT005728-01]
  7. National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NS052585-01, 1R21NS072652-01, 1R01NS070963]
  8. National Institutes of Health [T32DC000041]
  9. Ellison Medical Foundation
  10. VA San Diego Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health
  11. Office of Research and Development, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surface area of the cerebral cortex is a highly heritable trait, yet little is known about genetic influences on regional cortical differentiation in humans. Using a data-driven, fuzzy clustering technique with magnetic resonance imaging data from 406 twins, we parceled cortical surface area into genetic subdivisions, creating a human brain atlas based solely on genetically informative data. Boundaries of the genetic divisions corresponded largely to meaningful structural and functional regions; however, the divisions represented previously undescribed phenotypes different from conventional (non-genetically based) parcellation systems. The genetic organization of cortical area was hierarchical, modular, and predominantly bilaterally symmetric across hemispheres. We also found that the results were consistent with human-specific regions being subdivisions of previously described, genetically based lobar regionalization patterns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available