4.8 Article

2.8 Million Years of Arctic Climate Change from Lake El'gygytgyn, NE Russia

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 337, Issue 6092, Pages 315-320

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1222135

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ICDP
  2. NSF
  3. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  4. Alfred Wegener Institute
  5. Helmholtz Centre Potsdam (GFZ)
  6. Russian Academy of Sciences Far East Branch
  7. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  8. Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research
  9. BMBF [03G0642]
  10. German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) [ME 1169/21, ME 1169/24]
  11. NSF [0602471]
  12. Vetenskapsradet
  13. Swedish Research Council
  14. Kempe Foundation
  15. Civilian Research and Development Foundation [RUG1-2987-MA-10]
  16. Directorate For Geosciences
  17. Division Of Earth Sciences [1204087] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  18. Division Of Earth Sciences
  19. Directorate For Geosciences [0602471] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The reliability of Arctic climate predictions is currently hampered by insufficient knowledge of natural climate variability in the past. A sediment core from Lake El'gygytgyn in northeastern (NE) Russia provides a continuous, high-resolution record from the Arctic, spanning the past 2.8 million years. This core reveals numerous super interglacials during the Quaternary; for marine benthic isotope stages (MIS) 11c and 31, maximum summer temperatures and annual precipitation values are similar to 4 degrees to 5 degrees C and similar to 300 millimeters higher than those of MIS 1 and 5e. Climate simulations show that these extreme warm conditions are difficult to explain with greenhouse gas and astronomical forcing alone, implying the importance of amplifying feedbacks and far field influences. The timing of Arctic warming relative to West Antarctic Ice Sheet retreats implies strong interhemispheric climate connectivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available