4.8 Article

The Foot and Ankle of Australopithecus sediba

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 333, Issue 6048, Pages 1417-1420

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1202703

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. South African Department of Science and Technology
  2. South African National Research Foundation
  3. Institute for Human Evolution, Univ. of the Witwatersrand
  4. National Geographic Society
  5. Palaeontological Scientific Trust
  6. Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
  7. Ford Foundation
  8. U.S. Diplomatic Mission to South Africa
  9. French Embassy of South Africa
  10. Leakey Foundation
  11. Oppenheimer and Ackerman families
  12. R. Branson
  13. Univ. of the Witwatersrand's Schools of Geosciences and Anatomical Sciences
  14. Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A well-preserved and articulated partial foot and ankle of Australopithecus sediba, including an associated complete adult distal tibia, talus, and calcaneus, have been discovered at the Malapa site, South Africa, and reported in direct association with the female paratype Malapa Hominin 2. These fossils reveal a mosaic of primitive and derived features that are distinct from those seen in other hominins. The ankle (talocrural) joint is mostly humanlike in form and inferred function, and there is some evidence for a humanlike arch and Achilles tendon. However, Au. sediba is apelike in possessing a more gracile calcaneal body and a more robust medial malleolus than expected. These observations suggest, if present models of foot function are correct, that Au. sediba may have practiced a unique form of bipedalism and some degree of arboreality. Given the combination of features in the Au. sediba foot, as well as comparisons between Au. sediba and older hominins, homoplasy is implied in the acquisition of bipedal adaptations in the hominin foot.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available