4.8 Article

Frictional Characteristics of Atomically Thin Sheets

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 328, Issue 5974, Pages 76-80

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1184167

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [DMR-0520020, CMMI-0800154, CHE-0117752, CMMI-0927891]
  2. New York State Office of Science, Technology, and Academic Research (NYSTAR)
  3. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Center on Nanoscale Science and Technology for Integrated Micro/Nano-Electromechanical Transducers (iMINT) [HR0011-06-1-0048]
  4. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) [MURI FA955009-1-0705]
  5. Swiss NSF
  6. National Centers of Competence in Research (NCCR) MaNEP
  7. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  8. Directorate For Engineering [0800154, 0927891] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using friction force microscopy, we compared the nanoscale frictional characteristics of atomically thin sheets of graphene, molybdenum disulfide (MoS2), niobium diselenide, and hexagonal boron nitride exfoliated onto a weakly adherent substrate (silicon oxide) to those of their bulk counterparts. Measurements down to single atomic sheets revealed that friction monotonically increased as the number of layers decreased for all four materials. Suspended graphene membranes showed the same trend, but binding the graphene strongly to a mica surface suppressed the trend. Tip-sample adhesion forces were indistinguishable for all thicknesses and substrate arrangements. Both graphene and MoS2 exhibited atomic lattice stick-slip friction, with the thinnest sheets possessing a sliding-length-dependent increase in static friction. These observations, coupled with finite element modeling, suggest that the trend arises from the thinner sheets' increased susceptibility to out-of-plane elastic deformation. The generality of the results indicates that this may be a universal characteristic of nanoscale friction for atomically thin materials weakly bound to substrates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available