4.8 Article

Pathogenomics of Culex quinquefasciatus and Meta-Analysis of Infection Responses to Diverse Pathogens

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 330, Issue 6000, Pages 88-90

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1193162

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, IA, USA
  2. Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, Grand Challenges in Global Health Initiative
  3. NIH [P20 RR017686, R21 AI067642, R01 AI59492, R01 AI19769, R01 AI67698, R01 AI061576, R01 AI059492, R01 AI078997, F31 AI080161-01A1, T32 A107536]
  4. CDC [T01CCT622892]
  5. NIAID/NIH/DHHS [HHSN266200400039C, HHSN266200400001C]
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation [3100A0]
  7. Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute Core Facilities at the Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
  8. Giorgi-Cavlieri Foundation
  9. Wellcome Trust
  10. American Society for Microbiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus poses a substantial threat to human and veterinary health as a primary vector of West Nile virus (WNV), the filarial worm Wuchereria bancrofti, and an avian malaria parasite. Comparative phylogenomics revealed an expanded canonical C. quinquefasciatus immune gene repertoire compared with those of Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae. Transcriptomic analysis of C. quinquefasciatus genes responsive to WNV, W. bancrofti, and non-native bacteria facilitated an unprecedented meta-analysis of 25 vector-pathogen interactions involving arboviruses, filarial worms, bacteria, and malaria parasites, revealing common and distinct responses to these pathogen types in three mosquito genera. Our findings provide support for the hypothesis that mosquito-borne pathogens have evolved to evade innate immune responses in three vector mosquito species of major medical importance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available