4.8 Article

Fermi Observations of High-Energy Gamma-Ray Emission from GRB 080916C

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 323, Issue 5922, Pages 1688-1693

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1169101

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA
  2. Department of Energy in the United States
  3. Commissariat a lEnergie Atomique
  4. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et de Physique des Particules in France
  5. Agenzia Spaziale Italiana
  6. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare in Italy
  7. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)
  8. High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)
  9. Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) in Japan
  10. K. A. Wallenberg Foundation
  11. Swedish Research Council
  12. Swedish National Space Board in Sweden
  13. Deutsches Zentrum fur Luftund Raumfahrt in Germany
  14. STFC [PP/D000920/1, ST/G002630/1, ST/F006489/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  15. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/F006489/1, ST/G002630/1, PP/D000920/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  16. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are highly energetic explosions signaling the death of massive stars in distant galaxies. The Gamma-ray Burst Monitor and Large Area Telescope onboard the Fermi Observatory together record GRBs over a broad energy range spanning about 7 decades of gamma-ray energy. In September 2008, Fermi observed the exceptionally luminous GRB 080916C, with the largest apparent energy release yet measured. The high-energy gamma rays are observed to start later and persist longer than the lower energy photons. A simple spectral form fits the entire GRB spectrum, providing strong constraints on emission models. The known distance of the burst enables placing lower limits on the bulk Lorentz factor of the outflow and on the quantum gravity mass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available