4.4 Article

A comparison of conversion rates, clinical profiles and predictors of outcomes in two independent samples of individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis in China

Journal

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
Volume 197, Issue -, Pages 509-515

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.11.029

Keywords

Clinical high risk; Prodromal psychosis; Conversion rates

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFC1306803]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81671329, 81671332, 81361120403]
  3. Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [15411967200, 14411961400]
  4. National Key Clinical Disciplines at Shanghai Mental Health Center (OMA-MH) [2011-873]
  5. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders [13dz2260500]
  6. Division of Early Psychosis [2013-YJTSZK-05]
  7. Shanghai Jiao Tong University Foundation [14JCRY04, YG2014MS40]
  8. Shanghai Mental Health Center Foundation [2016-FX-01]
  9. SHSMU-ION Research Center for Brain Disorders [2015NKX001]
  10. Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader [16XD1402400]
  11. Fogarty and National Institutes of Mental Health grant [1R21MH093294-01A1]
  12. United States National Institute of Mental Health [K23 MH102358]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: In a previous epidemiological study, we reported on the ascertainment and outcomes of clinical high risk (CHR) individuals at the Shanghai Mental Health Center (SMHC, 2011 cohort). The current study compares demographic and clinical characteristics, including conversion rates, of this sample with a subsequently recruited, independent CHR sample and with published data from western samples. Method: A newsample of 100 CHR subjects (2013 cohort) was selected based on screening and semi-structured interviews. Both studies used the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS) for CHR assessment and conducted a naturalistic two-year follow-up. The two cohortswere compared on conversion rates, demographic and clinical characteristics, psychosis risk symptoms, and risk factors for psychotic conversion. Results: Ninety one (91%) of the 2013 cohort subjects completed the clinical two-year follow-up and 25 (27.5% of the 91) converted to a psychotic disorder over the follow-up period. A comparison of conversions to full psychosis between the 2013 and the 2011 cohorts showed no significant difference in time to conversion (Pairwise comparison:chi(2) - 0.3, p - 0.562). Both cohort studies showed that CHR subjects with more severe clinical symptoms at baseline and decline in functioning were more likely to convert to psychosis. Conclusions: Conversion rates in this new, independent Chinese sample are similar to those reported in non-Chinese samples and to the 2011 cohort. Future research is needed to examine whether the implementation of early intervention for CHR/prodromal symptoms reduces the risk of psychosis and decreases the conversion rate. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available