4.4 Article

Disruptive changes of cerebellar functional connectivity with the default mode network in schizophrenia

Journal

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
Volume 160, Issue 1-3, Pages 67-72

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.09.034

Keywords

Schizophrenia; Cerebellum; Default mode network; Functional connectivity

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [81271470, 31300840]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [4144092]
  3. National Key Project of China [AWS12J003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The default mode network (DMN) plays an important role in the physiopathology of schizophrenia. Previous studies have suggested that the cerebellum participates in higher-order cognitive networks such as the DMN. However, the specific contribution of the cerebellum to the DMN abnormalities in schizophrenia has yet to be established. In this study, we investigated cerebellar functional connectivity differences between 60 patients with schizophrenia and 60 healthy controls from a public resting-state fMRI database. Seed-based correlation analysis was performed by using seeds from the left Crus I, right Crus I and Lobule IX, which have previously been identified as being involved in the DMN. Our results revealed that, compared with the healthy controls, the patients showed significantly reduced cerebellar functional connectivity with the thalamus and several frontal regions including the middle frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and supplementary motor area. Moreover, the positive correlations between the strength of frontocerebellar and thalamocerebellar functional connectivity observed in the healthy subjects were diminished in the patients. Our findings implicate disruptive changes of the fronto-thalamo-cerebellar circuit in schizophrenia, which may provide further evidence for the cognitive dysmetria concept of schizophrenia. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available