4.4 Article

Neighbourhood-level socio-environmental factors and incidence of first episode psychosis by place at onset in rural Ireland: The Cavan-Monaghan First Episode Psychosis Study [CAMFEPS]

Journal

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
Volume 152, Issue 1, Pages 152-157

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.11.019

Keywords

First episode psychosis; Place at onset; Rurality; Environmental factors; Social context

Categories

Funding

  1. Stanley Medical Research Institute
  2. Cavan-Monaghan Mental Health Service
  3. Sir Henry Wellcome Research Fellowship from the Wellcome Trust [WT085540]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Little is known about associations between the social environment and risk for psychosis within rural settings. This study sought to investigate whether such associations exist within a rural context using a prospective dataset of unusual epidemiological completeness. Method: Using the Cavan-Monaghan First Episode Psychosis Study database of people aged 16 years and older, both ecological analyses and multilevel modelling were applied to investigate associations between incidence of psychosis by place at onset and socio-environmental risk factors of material deprivation, social fragmentation and urban-rural classification across electoral divisions. Results: The primary finding was an association between more deprived social contexts and higher rates of psychotic disorder, after adjustment for age and sex [all psychoses: incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.12, 95% CI (1.03-1.23)]. Conclusions: These findings support an association between adverse socio-environmental factors and increase in risk for psychosis by place at onset within a predominantly rural environment. This study suggests that social environmental characteristics may have an impact on risk across the urban-rural gradient. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available