4.4 Article

Developing models of how cognitive improvements change functioning: Mediation, moderation and moderated mediation

Journal

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
Volume 138, Issue 1, Pages 88-93

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.03.020

Keywords

Schizophrenia; Rehabilitation; Cognitive remediation therapy; Functioning

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council UK
  2. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  3. Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London
  4. MRC Brain Sciences Initiative [TP59]
  5. Economic and Social Research Council [PTA-026-27-0520] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. National Institute for Health Research [PB-PG-0807-14002, NF-SI-0509-10023] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [PB-PG-0807-14002] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Cognitive remediation (CRT) affects functioning but the extent and type of cognitive improvements necessary are unknown. Aim: To develop and test models of how cognitive improvement transfers to work behaviour using the data from a current service. Method: Participants (N49) with a support worker and a paid or voluntary job were offered CRT in a Phase 2 single group design with three assessments: baseline, post therapy and follow-up. Working memory, cognitive flexibility, planning and work outcomes were assessed. Results: Three models were tested (mediation - cognitive improvements drive functioning improvement; moderation - post treatment cognitive level affects the impact of CRT on functioning; moderated mediation cognition drives functioning improvements only after a certain level is achieved). There was evidence of mediation (planning improvement associated with improved work quality). There was no evidence that cognitive flexibility (total Wisconsin Card Sorting Test errors) and working memory(Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III digit span) mediated work functioning despite significant effects. There was some evidence of moderated mediation for planning improvement if participants had poorer memory and/or made fewer WCST errors. The total CRT effect on work quality was d=0.55, but the indirect (planning-mediated CRT effect) was d=0.082 Conclusion: Planning improvements led to better work quality but only accounted for a small proportion of the total effect on work outcome. Other specific and non-specific effects of CRT and the work programme are likely to account for some of the remaining effect. This is the first time complex models have been tested and future Phase 3 studies need to further test mediation and moderated mediation models. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available