4.4 Article

Reduced language lateralization in first-episode medication-naive schizophrenia

Journal

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
Volume 127, Issue 1-3, Pages 195-201

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.12.013

Keywords

Schizophrenia; Medication-naive; Language lateralization; Superior temporal gyrus; Inferior frontal gyrus; fMRI

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diminished functional lateralization in language-related areas is found in chronic schizophrenia. It is not clear at what stage of illness these abnormalities in lateralization arise, or whether they are affected by medication. In addition, it is hypothesized that reduced language lateralization is related to positive symptoms of schizophrenia, but studies addressing this issue have yielded contradictory results. In this study we used functional MRI to measure language lateralization in 35 first-episode medication-naive schizophrenia patients and 43 matched healthy controls. Subjects performed three language tasks: a paced verb generation task, an antonym generation task, and a semantic decision task. Lateralization Index (LI) was calculated, using a relative threshold technique, in seven Regions of Interest (ROls), including the main language-related areas and their contralateral homologues. In addition, we investigated whether language lateralization was correlated with psychotic symptoms. Across all ROls, LI was significantly reduced in patients (p < 0.001) compared to controls. Post-hoc tests revealed that this reduction was most prominent in the inferior frontal gyrus (part of Broca's area) (p = 0.003) and the superior temporal gyrus (part of Wernicke's area) (p < 0.001). LI was not correlated with the positive subscale of the PANSS, nor with hallucinations or disorganization. This is the first study to report reduced LI at the onset of schizophrenia, before medical treatment is initiated. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available