4.4 Article

Social cognitive skills training in schizophrenia: An initial efficacy study of stabilized outpatients

Journal

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
Volume 107, Issue 1, Pages 47-54

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.09.006

Keywords

Schizophrenia; Social cognition; Psychosocial treatment; Functional outcome

Categories

Funding

  1. [VISN 22 MIRECC]
  2. [MH43292]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R29MH043292, R03MH077141, R01MH043292] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Social cognitive deficits are promising treatment targets for new interventions to improve functional outcome in schizophrenia. A few preliminary studies of inpatients support the feasibility of improving social cognition through psychosocial interventions. This clinical trial evaluated a new 12-session social cognitive skills training program designed to address four aspects of social cognition (affect perception, social perception, attributional style, Theory of Mind) in outpatients with psychosis, a population for whom such interventions will likely be very useful. Thirty-one clinically stabilized outpatients were randomly assigned to a social cognition skills training intervention or a time-matched control condition (illness self-management and relapse prevention skills training), and completed pre- and post-treatment assessments of social cognition, neurocognition, and symptoms. The social cognition group demonstrated a large, significant improvement in facial affect perception, which was not present in the control group. This improvement was independent of changes in basic neurocognitive functioning or symptoms. Results support the efficacy of a social cognitive intervention for community-dwelling outpatients and encourage further development of this treatment approach to achieve broader improvements in social cognition and generalization of treatment gains. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available