Journal
SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 892-899Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbu170
Keywords
psychosis; schizophrenia; negative symptoms; antipsychotics; treatment
Categories
Funding
- NARSAD Young Investigator Award
- National Institute for Health Research Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
- King's College London
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objectives: Existing treatments for schizophrenia can improve positive symptoms, but it is unclear if they have any impact on negative symptoms. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of available treatments for negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Methods: All randomized-controlled trials of interventions for negative symptoms in schizophrenia until December 2013 were retrieved; 168 unique and independent placebo-controlled trials were used. Negative symptom scores at baseline and follow-up, duration of illness, doses of medication, type of interventions, and sample demographics were extracted. Heterogeneity was addressed with the I-2 and Q statistic. Standardized mean difference in values of the Negative Symptom Rating Scale used in each study was calculated as the main outcome measure. Results: 6503 patients in the treatment arm and 5815 patients in the placebo arm were included. No evidence of publication biases found. Most treatments reduced negative symptoms at follow-up relative to placebo: second-generation antipsychotics: -0.579 (-0.755 to -0.404); antidepressants: -0.349 (-0.551 to -0.146); combinations of pharmacological agents: -0.518 (-0.757 to -0.279); glutamatergic medications: -0.289 (-0.478 to -0.1); psychological interventions: -0.396 (-0.563 to -0.229). No significant effect was found for first-generation antipsychotics: -0.531 (-1.104 to 0.041) and brain stimulation: -0.228 (-0.775 to 0.319). Effects of most treatments were not clinically meaningful as measured on Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale. Conclusions and Relevance: Although some statistically significant effects on negative symptoms were evident, none reached the threshold for clinically significant improvement.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available