4.6 Article

Treatments of Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: Meta-Analysis of 168 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials

Journal

SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 892-899

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbu170

Keywords

psychosis; schizophrenia; negative symptoms; antipsychotics; treatment

Categories

Funding

  1. NARSAD Young Investigator Award
  2. National Institute for Health Research Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  3. King's College London

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Existing treatments for schizophrenia can improve positive symptoms, but it is unclear if they have any impact on negative symptoms. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of available treatments for negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Methods: All randomized-controlled trials of interventions for negative symptoms in schizophrenia until December 2013 were retrieved; 168 unique and independent placebo-controlled trials were used. Negative symptom scores at baseline and follow-up, duration of illness, doses of medication, type of interventions, and sample demographics were extracted. Heterogeneity was addressed with the I-2 and Q statistic. Standardized mean difference in values of the Negative Symptom Rating Scale used in each study was calculated as the main outcome measure. Results: 6503 patients in the treatment arm and 5815 patients in the placebo arm were included. No evidence of publication biases found. Most treatments reduced negative symptoms at follow-up relative to placebo: second-generation antipsychotics: -0.579 (-0.755 to -0.404); antidepressants: -0.349 (-0.551 to -0.146); combinations of pharmacological agents: -0.518 (-0.757 to -0.279); glutamatergic medications: -0.289 (-0.478 to -0.1); psychological interventions: -0.396 (-0.563 to -0.229). No significant effect was found for first-generation antipsychotics: -0.531 (-1.104 to 0.041) and brain stimulation: -0.228 (-0.775 to 0.319). Effects of most treatments were not clinically meaningful as measured on Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale. Conclusions and Relevance: Although some statistically significant effects on negative symptoms were evident, none reached the threshold for clinically significant improvement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available