4.6 Article

The antioxidant mechanism of nitroxide TEMPO: scavenging with glutathionyl radicals

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 5, Issue 78, Pages 63655-63661

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ra06129f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Around five top priorities program of One-Three-Five Strategic Planning of Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  2. National Science & Technology Major Project of China [2011ZX05011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A rhodamine-nitroxide probe (R-NOc), combining rhodamine fluorophore with a 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinyl-1-oxy (TEMPO) receptor unit was introduced to probe glutathionyl radicals (GSc) with high sensitivity and selectivity. The R-NOc probe could effectively scavenge GSc radicals with fluorescence enhancement since the nitroxide group restored the fluorescence properties. In this work, horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-catalyzed and metal-catalyzed oxidation systems were selected as the model of simulating the generation of GSc, and we found that the metal-catalyzed system had the same experimental results with the HRP-catalyzed system, which provided a new approach to demonstrate the strong oxidant ability of the hydroxyl radical (cOH) to initiate toxic GSc. Furthermore, we confirmed that the production of GSc abided by a radical-initiated peroxidation mechanism of GSH with the mass spectrometry (MS) analysis and fluorescence spectroscopy. By using combined high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) detection and MS analysis, we also demonstrated that the R-NOc was converted into fluorescent secondary amine derivative (R-NH). The application of the probe in biological system was explored to monitor GSc in HL-60 cells and secondary amine fluorescence was observed upon stimulation by hydrogen peroxide and phenol. Development of fluorescence was prevented via preincubation with the thiol-blocking reagent N-ethylmaleimide (NEM).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available