4.0 Article

Gout and risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 466-471

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/03009741003742797

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education of Taiwan [EMRPD180201]
  2. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital [CMRPG370401]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To investigate the association between gout and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Methods: The study subjects were participants in a health-screening programme at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from 2000 to 2006. Subjects were classified into eight groups based on serum urate (SU) level and gout status (<= 4.9, 5.0-6.9, 7.0-8.9, and >= 9.0 mg/dL, without and with gout). The association between gout and NAFLD was assessed by multiple logistic regression. Results: Among a total of 54 325 subjects, 1930 (3.6%) had gout and 6169 (11.3%) had NAFLD. The prevalence of NAFLD was significantly higher in subjects with gout (23.1%, n = 445) than in those without gout (10.9%, n = 5724, p < 0.001). Among subjects with NAFLD, the severity of NAFLD was higher in gout patients. Gout was associated with an increased risk for NAFLD [odds ratio (OR) 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-1.60, p < 0.001], after adjustment for age, sex, presence of metabolic syndrome, and low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). With SU <= 4.9 mg/dL in the absence of gout as reference, the ORs (95% CI) for NAFLD, after adjustment for age, sex, presence of metabolic syndrome, and low eGFR, were, respectively, 2.16 (1.94-2.41), 3.98 (3.55-4.46), and 5.99 (5.19-6.90) for SU levels 2-4 in those without gout and 2.61 (1.39-4.91), 2.87 (2.04-4.04), 4.53 (3.70-5.56), and 6.31 (5.12-7.77) for SU levels 1-4 in those with gout. Conclusions: There was an independent association between gout and the risk for NAFLD. In addition, there was a dose-response relationship between SU and NAFLD in subjects with and without gout.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available