4.3 Article

Adolescents' adverse experiences and mental health in a prospective perspective

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 58-63

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1403494810375491

Keywords

Adolescents; long-term effects; mental distress; mental healing; negative life experiences

Funding

  1. Norwegian Foundation for Health and Rehabilitation
  2. Norwegian Institute of Public Health
  3. University of Oslo
  4. City of Oslo (baseline)
  5. Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: The aim of this study is to examine the possible changes in depressive symptoms related to various adverse experiences, based on a three-year follow-up among adolescents. Methods: All 10(th) graders invited to enter the youth section of the Oslo Health Study 2001 (n = 3,811) constituted a baseline of a longitudinal study. A high level of mental distress (Hscl-10 score >= 1.85) according to the different life experiences was compared, at baseline (15 years) and follow-up (18 years). Results: All adverse experiences were associated with a high Hscl-10 score except parents not living together and death of a close person at 15 and 18 years for boys, and death of a close person at 18 years of age for girls. A development from high Hscl-10 score at baseline to low score at follow up was defined as recovery from mental distress. The proportion of the youth that had a high Hscl-10 score related to reporting adverse life experiences at age 15, followed by a low Hscl-10 score three years later proved to be between 44% and 89% among boys and between 16% and 31% among girls. Conclusions: From a three year longitudinal perspective the recovery from mental distress is substantial and higher among boys than among girls. However, mental distress seems to persist in a considerable proportion of the adolescents. Consequently, it is insufficient to brush aside traumas and hurt and rely on a time healing process only.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available