4.1 Article

When doctors experience their vulnerability as beneficial for the patients

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 85-90

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02813430802661811

Keywords

Family practice; focus groups; identification (psychology); physicians role; physician-patient relationship; qualitative research; risk-taking

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To describe events where doctors have experienced that their own sense of vulnerability might have been beneficial for the patient. Design. Qualitative focus group study with data drawn from two group sessions. Analysis was conducted with systematic text condensation. Subjects. A total of 12 GPs (five men and seven women) aged 30-68 participated. Their clinical experience ranged from one to 39 years. Main outcome measures. Analysis presented different aspects of participants' experiences of vulnerability experienced as beneficial. Results. The participants generously shared stories about personal and professional vulnerability which they had perceived and sometimes disclosed to the patient. One cluster of stories dealt with situations where the doctors in some way or other had identified with the patient and his or her problem. They felt that their awareness and capacity for interpretation, creative solutions, and compassion had been enhanced through recognition. Another cluster of stories covered events where uncomfortable feelings due to uncertainty or inconsiderate behaviour sharpened the doctors' reflexivity towards their own roles in the interaction. Presenting an excuse or sharing the doubt could break the ice and make a difference. Implications. Vulnerability may bring strength, but must be used with caution. Our study opens towards further awareness of the vulnerability of the doctor and how it can benefit the patient in some situations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available