4.5 Article

Dependence of hemoglobin mass estimation with the optimized CO-rebreathing method on different spectrophotometers

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01247.x

Keywords

anti-doping; analytical error; carboxyhemoglobin

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The assessment of total hemoglobin mass (tHb-mass) with the optimized carbon monoxide-rebreathing procedure (oCOR) is discussed as a promising method to detect blood doping. The method requires repeated measurements of the carboxyhemoglobin fraction (%HbCO) using spectrophotometers (CO oximeters). In order to determine whether %HbCO measurements with different spectrophotometers yield similar tHb-masses, the results of 57 tHb-mass calculations from simultaneous %HbCO measurements with two different spectrophotometers (RapidLab, OSM3) were analyzed. For the comparison of longitudinal tHb-mass alterations (?tHb-mass), 3 tHb-mass measurements were obtained at 6-month intervals (3337 subjects). Because of significant differences in %HbCO measurements, the limits of agreement for tHb-massOSM3 and tHb-massRapidLab were 11.2% (95% reference range -6.8 to +15.6%) and the correlation of ?tHb-masses as determined with the two spectrophotometers over two time intervals was weak (r: 0.280.66). In only about 70% of all ?tHb-mass estimations did ?tHb-massOSM3 and ?tHb-massRapidLab show the same direction of change. Apparently, the analytical variation in tHb-mass determination with oCOR increases considerably with the use of different spectrophotometers. Therefore, agreement on the use of one spectrophotometer that accurately measures low %HbCO values is needed if oCOR should be used in an anti-doping setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available