4.2 Article

Co-culture of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma spheroids with autologous monocytes predicts prognosis

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 67, Issue 4, Pages 392-399

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2008.02072.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Co-culture of monocytes with autologous fragment (F) spheroids originating from malignant (M) tumour or benign (B) control mucosa of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) yields interleukin (IL)-6 and monocyte chemo-attractant protein (MCP)-1 secretion. This study investigates the association between this cytokine co-culture response and prognosis. Analysis of IL-6 and MCP-1 content of supernatants from monocytes in vitro co-culture with autologous MF- or BF-spheroids was investigated in a cohort of HNSCC patients (n = 65) diagnosed between 1998 and 2005, all of whom were treated with curative intent by primary surgery. The IL-6 response was expressed as a fraction of the lipopolysaccharid response of the same batch of monocytes. Recurrence, survival and causes of death were then established following the second part of 2005. MCP-1 levels did not predict prognosis. We found that increased levels of IL-6 from autologous monocytes in co-culture with MF-spheroids predicted recurrence with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.5 [confidence interval (CI): 1.01-2.60; P = 0.05] and co-culture with BF-spheroids and monocytes predicted recurrence (HR = 4.17; CI: 1.54-11.29; P = 0.005). The same results where obtained in addition with TNM stage of the patients. Simultaneous analysis of BF- and MF-spheroid co-culture IL-6 responses as well as adjustment for age and TNM stage of the patients allowed prediction of total survival (HR = 3.1; CI: 1.11-8.56; P = 0.03) based on BF co-culture levels. IL-6 secreted upon in vitro co-culture with monocytes and BF-spheroids predicts recurrence and prognosis, whereas co-culture with monocytes and MF-spheroids predicts recurrence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available