4.3 Article

Strong predictors for alcohol recidivism after liver transplantation: Non-acceptance of the alcohol problem and abstinence of <3 months

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 10, Pages 1257-1266

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2011.603160

Keywords

Alcohol recidivism; alcoholic liver disease; liver transplantation; predictors; quality of life

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Alcohol-toxic liver cirrhosis (ALC) is one of the main indications for liver transplantation (LT). The aim of the study is to define predictors for alcohol recidivism and to identify the outcome and quality of life of such patients. Material and methods. From March 2003 to July 2009, 226 patients underwent LT in our centre. In 53% liver cirrhosis was caused by alcohol abuse (sole/cofactor). Outcome and alcohol recidivism were assessed using patients' records, laboratory tests and interviews (patient, family members and family doctor). Furthermore, patients received an SF-36 quality of life and a self-designed questionnaire anonymously. Results. Mean follow-up after LT was 31 + 23 months. The 5-year survival rate after LT in patients with ALC was significantly better compared to patients with other indications (78 vs. 64%; p = 0.016). Quality of life of both patient groups was comparable. After LT, alcohol recidivism rate was 16%. Patients with an alcohol abstinence of < 3 months before LT had a significantly higher (p = 0.012) rate of alcohol recidivism in comparison to those with an abstinence of > 3 months. Another predictor for alcohol recidivism was the patients' non-acceptance of having an alcohol problem before LT (p = 0.001). Conclusions. ALC is a good indication for LT. An alcohol abstinence of < 3 months before LT and a non-acceptance of having an alcohol problem are strong predictors for alcohol recidivism after LT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available