4.3 Article

Serum biomarkers for atrophic gastritis and antibodies against Helicobacter pylori in the elderly: Implications for vitamin B-12, folic acid and iron status and response to oral vitamin therapy

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 9, Pages 1050-1056

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00365520802078341

Keywords

atrophic gastritis; controlled trial; elderly; homocysteine; methylmalonic acid; vitamin B-12

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. To investigate the prevalence of serological markers for chronic atrophic gastritis (AG) and Helicobacter pylori antibodies (HPAb) in an elderly population, and to examine the interrelationship and significance for cobalamin, folic acid and iron status and response to oral vitamin therapy. Material and methods. The study included community-dwelling subjects (n=209), mean age 76 years, randomized to 4 month of oral daily treatment with 0.5 mg cyanocobalamin, 0.8 mg folic acid and 3 mg vitamin B6 or placebo (double-blind). Biochemical tests were carried out before and after treatment. Results. AG, as indicated by a pepsinogen I/II ratio 2.9, occurred in 14% (26/190) and HPAb in 54% (102/190) of the subjects. AG subjects had higher levels of serum methylmalonic acid (MMA) (p0.001), plasma homocysteine (tHcy) (p0.05), lower haemoglobin (Hb) (p0.01) and a higher prevalence of vitamin B12 deficiency (p0.01). HPAb was associated with AG, whereas AG subjects without HPAb had higher tHcy and MMA levels. There was no correlation between AG and iron status. Oral vitamin treatment led to greater (albeit non-significant) improvements in MMA, tHcy and total cobalamins in AG subjects compared to non-AG subjects. Conclusions. AG is a common condition and is a significant determinant of vitamin B12 status. AG is correlated to HPAB and lower Hb. Elderly AG subjects respond at least as well as non-AG subjects to oral treatment with B-vitamins in the doses employed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available