4.2 Article

Using pre-classification to improve the accuracy of species-specific forest attribute estimates from airborne laser scanner data and aerial images

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 336-345

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2014.986520

Keywords

forest inventory; discrimination; stratified data; LiDAR; k-NN

Categories

Funding

  1. Norwegian Forest Trust Fund (Skogtiltaksfondet)
  2. Innovation Norway
  3. Mjosen Skog SA
  4. Foran Norge AS
  5. Norwegian University of Life Sciences
  6. University of Eastern Finland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to examine whether pre-classification (stratification) of training data according to main tree species and stand development stage could improve the accuracy of species-specific forest attribute estimates compared to estimates without stratification using k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) imputations. The study included training data of 509 training plots and 80 validation plots from a conifer forest area in southeastern Norway. The results showed that stratification carried out by interpretation of aerial images did not improve the accuracy of the species-specific estimates due to stratification errors. The training data can of course be correctly stratified using field observations, but in the application phase the stratification entirely relies on auxiliary information with complete coverage over the entire area of interest which cannot be corrected. We therefore tried to improve the stratification using canopy height information from airborne laser scanning to discriminate between young and mature stands. The results showed that this approach slightly improved the accuracy of the k-NN predictions, especially for the main tree species (2.6% for spruce volume). Furthermore, if metrics from aerial images were used to discriminate between pine and spruce dominance in the mature plots, the accuracy of volume of pine was improved by 73.2% in pine-dominated stands while for spruce an adverse effect of 12.6% was observed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available