4.3 Article

Quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of acute toxicity of diverse chemicals to Daphnia magna with whole molecule descriptors

Journal

SAR AND QSAR IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 22, Issue 7-8, Pages 757-774

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1062936X.2011.623317

Keywords

Daphnia magna; acute toxicity; QSAR; molecular descriptors; best multi-linear regression

Funding

  1. Estonian Ministry for Education and Research [SF0140031Bs09]
  2. Estonian Science Foundation [7709]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis and estimation of toxicological effects at lower-mid trophic levels provide first aid means to understand the toxicity of chemicals. Daphnia magna serves as a good starting point for such toxicity studies and is also recognized for regulatory use in estimating the risk of chemicals. The ECOTOX database was queried and analysed for available data and a homogenous subset of 253 compounds for the endpoint LC50 48 h was established. A four-parameter quantitative structure-activity relationship was derived (coefficient of determination, r(2) = 0.740) for half of the compounds and internally validated (leave-one-out cross-validated coefficient of determination, r(cv)(2) = 0.714; leave-many-out coefficient of determination, r(LMO)(2) = 0.738). External validation was carried out with the remaining half of the compounds (coefficient of determination for external validation, r(ext)(2) = 0.634). Two of the descriptors in the model (log P, average bonding information content) capture the structural characteristics describing penetration through bio-membranes. Another two descriptors (energy of highest occupied molecular orbital, weighted partial negative surface area) capture the electronic structural characteristics describing the interaction between the chemical and its hypothetic target in the cell. The applicability domain was subsequently analysed and discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available