4.7 Article

A proposed semi-quantitative framework for comprehensive risk assessment of urban hazard installations considering rescue accessibility and evacuation vulnerability

Journal

SAFETY SCIENCE
Volume 110, Issue -, Pages 192-203

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.013

Keywords

Comprehensive risk assessment; Rescue accessibility; Evacuation vulnerability; Hazard installation

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC1405304]
  2. United States Department of Transportation [DTRT13-G-UTC34]
  3. China Scholarship Council
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91224008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With rapid economic growth, previously less populated peripheral areas of major cities in China have now become densely populated. Many hazardous installations (e.g., chemical plants, tank farms, depots of explosive materials, etc.) that used to be in these less populated areas are now found in the backyards of millions of citizens going about their daily lives with minimal knowledge about the dangers these installations pose. A hazard mishap that may have been containable with no human loss just 30 years ago can now threaten the lives of millions. While numerous studies have assessed hazard-specific risks, few efforts have attempted to establish a comprehensive framework to assess multi-hazard scenarios. For this purpose, this study developed a framework for spatial risk assessment of multiple hazardous installations in a metropolitan area. The framework includes three quantitative models for the analysis of the inherent danger associated with, the accessibility for rescue operations at, and the potential effectiveness of mass evacuation from these hazardous installations. Based on this framework and its quantitative models, a case study of the city of Beijing was conducted in this research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available