4.7 Article

Research on flood risk analysis and evaluation method based on variable fuzzy sets and information diffusion

Journal

SAFETY SCIENCE
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages 1275-1283

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.01.007

Keywords

Variable fuzzy sets; Information diffusion; Analytical hierarchy process; Flood risk assessment

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2007CB714107]
  2. Key Projects in the National Science and Technology Pillar Program [2008BAB29808]
  3. Special Research Foundation for the Public Welfare Industry of the Ministry of Science and Technology
  4. Ministry of Water Resources [201001080]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Floods have become increasingly alarming worldwide. Flood risk management in terms of assessing disaster risk properly is a great challenge that society faces today. Natural disaster risk analysis is typically beset with issues such as imprecision, uncertainty, and partial truth. There are two basic forms of uncertainty related to natural disaster risk assessment, namely, randomness caused by inherent stochastic variability and fuzziness due to macroscopic grad and incomplete knowledge sample. However, the traditional probability statistical method ignores the fuzziness of risk assessment with incomplete data sets and requires a large sample size of data. The fuzzy set methodology is introduced in the area of disaster risk assessment to improve probability estimation. The purpose of the current study is to establish a fuzzy model to evaluate flood risk with incomplete data sets. The present paper puts forward a composite method based on variable fuzzy sets and information diffusion method for disaster risk assessment. The results indicate that the methodology is effective and practical; thus, it has the potential to forecast the flood risk in flood risk management. We hope that by conducting such risk analysis, the impact of flood disasters can be mitigated in the future. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available