4.2 Article

Involvement of nitric oxide in acquired thermotolerance of rice seedlings

Journal

RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages 785-790

Publisher

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1134/S1021443713060149

Keywords

Oryza sativa; nitric oxide; acquired thermotolerance; heat stress; seedlings

Categories

Funding

  1. Key Course Construction Program of the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (Plant Physiology)
  2. Alliance Plan of Shanghai Promotion Association of Science and Technology Achievements: The design and application of root-control box
  3. Education Reform Program of Shanghai Institute of Technology: Reform and Exploration of Experiment Teaching Mode for Horticulture Majors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of nitric oxide (NO) in thermotolerance acquired by heat acclimation (38A degrees C) was investigated. Results showed that 38A degrees C acclimation, on the one hand, obviously reduced hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and MDA contents and ion leakage degree in rice leaves; however, on the other hand, it increased the survival of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings under 50A degrees C heat stress. Application of nitric oxide donor, sodium nitroprusside (SNP), prior to 38A degrees C acclimation dramatically increased the acquired thermotolerance. To elucidate the role of endogenous NO in acquired thermotolerance, 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (PTIO, a specific NO scavenger) was used (scavengers are used to control the level of both exogenous and endogenous NO). Results showed that PTIO pretreatment resulted in the elimination of acquired thermotolerance induced by 38A degrees C acclimation in rice seedlings. Nitric oxide (NO) release measurement indicated that there was indeed an abrupt elevation in the NO content in 40 min after 38A degrees C acclimation, proving the involvement of NO in acquired thermotolerance inducement in rice seedling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available