4.6 Article

One-class classification based authentication of peanut oils by fatty acid profiles

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 5, Issue 103, Pages 85046-85051

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ra07329d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Project of National Science & Technology Pillar Plan [2012BAK08B03]
  2. Special Fund for Quality Inspection Research in the Public Interest [2012104010-4]
  3. National Major Project for Agro-product Quality & Safety Risk Assessment [GJFP2015006]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21205118]
  5. earmarked fund for China Agriculture research system [CARS-13]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developing a method of identifying oil authenticity is becoming critical for protecting customers' rights as adulteration of edible oils is a particular concern in food quality. Since adulterants in edible oils are usually unknown, the authenticity identification is a one-class classification problem in chemometrics. In this study, a one-class classification model was built to identify the authenticity of peanut oils by fatty acid profiles. Based on previous studies, 28 fatty acids were identified and quantified for peanut oils. The authenticity identification model was built by one-class partial least squares (OCPLS) classifier for peanut oils. Subsequently, the established model was validated by independent test sets. The results indicated that the OCPLS classifier could effectively detect adulterated oils and was therefore employed for authenticity assessment. Moreover, counterfeit oils adulterated with different levels of other edible oils were simulated by the Monte Carlo method and employed to test the lowest adulteration level of this one-class classifier. As a result, the model could identify peanut oils and sensitively detect adulteration of edible oils with other vegetable oils at adulteration level of more than 4%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available