4.1 Article

Principal distinction of the methods of low-frequency and ultrasonic effects on Melts

Journal

RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF NON-FERROUS METALS
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages 509-512

Publisher

ALLERTON PRESS INC
DOI: 10.3103/S1067821214060091

Keywords

low-frequency treatment of melts; ultrasonic treatment of melts; cavitation; pseudocavitation

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [11-03-12082]
  2. Interdisciplinary Project of the Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science and Physical-Technical Institute of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences [12-M-23-2043]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Factors that determine the difference between low-frequency and ultrasonic treatments methods are discussed: cavitation phenomena, dissipative losses, and the possibility for the turbulent mixing of the melts. The independence of each method is proven.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available