4.0 Article Proceedings Paper

Phanerozoic mafic magmatism in the southern Siberian craton: geodynamic implications

Journal

RUSSIAN GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS
Volume 51, Issue 9, Pages 952-964

Publisher

RUSSIAN ACAD SCIENCES, SIBERIAN BRANCH, VS SOBOLEV INST GEOL & MINEROL
DOI: 10.1016/j.rgg.2010.08.005

Keywords

dolerite; trap; dike; SHRIMP-II; Paleozoic; Mesozoic; Siberian craton; Paleoasian ocean

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Phanerozoic history of mafic magmatism in the southern Siberian craton included three major events. The earliest event (similar to 500 Ma) recorded in dolerite dikes occurred during accretion and collision at the early stage of the Central Asian orogen. Injection of mafic melts into the upper crust was possible in zones of diffuse extension within the southern Siberian craton which acted as an indenter. The Late Paleozoic event (similar to 275 Ma) produced dikes that intruded in a setting of subduction-related extension at the back of the active continental margin of Siberia during closure of the Mongolia-Okhotsk ocean, as well as slightly older volcanics (290 Ma) in the Transbaikalian segment of the Central Asian orogen. Early Mesozoic magmatism in the southern Siberian craton resulted in numerous 240-250 Ma mafic intrusions in the Angara-Taseeva basin. The intrusions (Siberian traps) appeared as the subducting slab of the Mongolia-Okhotsk ocean interacted with a lower mantle plume. The post-Late Paleozoic ages of flood basalts (290-275 Ma) correspond to progressive northwestward (in present coordinates) motion of the slab beneath the southern craton margin which likely ceased after the slab had reached the zone of the Siberian superplume. Since its consolidation after the Early Mesozoic activity, the crust in the area has no longer experienced extension favorable for intrusion of basaltic magma. (C) 2010, V.S. Sobolev IGM, Siberian Branch of the RAS. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available