4.4 Article

Estimation of forest stand diameter class using airborne lidar and field data

Journal

REMOTE SENSING LETTERS
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages 419-428

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/2150704X.2015.1035770

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012R1A6A3A01011366]
  2. Ministry of Public Safety & Security (MPSS), Republic of Korea [주요01-03-01] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A6A3A01011366] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a method for estimating the stand diameter at breast height (DBH) classes in a South Korea forest using airborne lidar and field data was proposed. First, a digital surface model (DSM) and digital terrain model (DTM) were generated from the lidar data that have a point density of 4.3 points/m(2), then a tree canopy model (TCM) was created by subtracting the DTM from the DSM. The tree height and crown diameter were estimated from the rasterized TCM using local maximum points, minimum points and a circle fitting algorithm. Individual tree heights and crown diameters were converted into DBH using the allometric equations obtained from the field survey data. We calculated the proportion of the total number of individual trees belonging to each DBH class in each stand to determine the stand DBH class according to the standard guidelines. More than 60% of the stand DBH classes were correctly estimated by the proposed method, and their area occupied over 80% of the total forest area. The proposed method generated more accurate results compared to the digital forest type map provided by the government.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available