4.0 Article

T2′ Imaging of Native Kidneys and Renal Allografts - a Feasibility Study

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245597

Keywords

transplantation; kidney; BOLD; non-contrast-enhanced MRI; susceptibility; MR functional imaging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of T2' mapping in native kidneys and renal allografts. Materials and Methods: Following approval of the local ethics committee, 24 renal allograft recipients and 10 control subjects (healthy volunteers) were included in this study. Multi-echo T2 and T2* imaging was performed on a 1.5 Tesla scanner. Allograft recipients were assigned to two groups: group a), 8 patients with good (glomerular filtration rate of more than 40 ml/min) allograft function and no evidence of transplant rejection, transplant renal artery stenosis or ureteral obstruction; group b), 16 patients with deterioration of renal graft function (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 40 ml/min or less). Two different imaging protocols were tested. Results: The mean T2' relaxation parameters were 108.33 msec +/- 13.34, 100.00 msec +/- 18.89 and 124.57 msec +/- 6.51 for groups a), b) and for control subjects, respectively. The reduction of T2' values in patient group b) was not statistically significant. However, significant correlations could be demonstrated between T2' values and the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of renal allograft function. The reproducibility was tested and the coefficients of variation of T2' values in the cortex of transplanted kidneys were 11.1% within subjects and 11.3% between subjects. Conclusion: Our results indicate that T2' imaging is a promising non-enhanced technique, which seems to reveal information on transplant function. Further studies are required to determine the clinical value of T2' mapping for monitoring renal allograft recipients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available