4.7 Article

An Analysis of Consolidation Grouting Effect of Bedrock Based on its Acoustic Velocity Increase

Journal

ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING
Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages 1259-1274

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-014-0624-7

Keywords

Hydraulic engineering; Rock mass; Consolidation grouting; Acoustic velocity

Funding

  1. Special Funds for Major State Basic Research Project [2011CB013501]
  2. National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [51125037]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51279146]
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0425]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acoustic velocity is an important parameter to evaluate the mechanical properties of fractured rock masses. Based on the in situ acoustic velocity measurement data of similar to 20 hydropower stations in China, we assessed the acoustic velocity increase of rock masses as a result of consolidation grouting in different geological conditions, such as fault sites, weathered areas and excavation-induced damage zones. We established an empirical relationship between the acoustic velocity of rock masses before and after consolidation grouting, and examined the correlation between acoustic velocity and deformation modulus. A case study is presented about a foundation consolidation grouting project for an intake tower of Pubugou Hydropower Station. The results show that different types of rock masses possess distinct ranges for resultant acoustic velocity increase by consolidation grouting. Under a confidence interval of 95 %, the ranges of the increasing rate of acoustic velocity in a faulted zone, weathered zone, and excavation-induced damage zone are observed to be 12.7-43.1, 12.3-31.2, and 6.9-14.5 %, respectively. The acoustic velocity before grouting and its increasing rate can be used to predict the effectiveness of consolidation grouting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available