4.4 Article

Design and validation of the RiceWrist-S exoskeleton for robotic rehabilitation after incomplete spinal cord injury

Journal

ROBOTICA
Volume 32, Issue 8, Pages 1415-1431

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0263574714001490

Keywords

Robot dynamics; Exoskeletons; Robotic rehabilitation; Human-robot interaction

Categories

Funding

  1. Mission Connect
  2. TIRR Foundation
  3. National Science Foundation [0940902]
  4. NSF [CNS-1135916]
  5. [H133P0800007-NIDRR-ARRT]
  6. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  7. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [1135916] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Robotic devices are well-suited to provide high intensity upper limb therapy in order to induce plasticity and facilitate recovery from brain and spinal cord injury. In order to realise gains in functional independence, devices that target the distal joints of the arm are necessary. Further, the robotic device must exhibit key dynamic properties that enable both high dynamic transparency for assessment, and implementation of novel interaction control modes that significantly engage the participant. In this paper, we present the kinematic design, dynamical characterization, and clinical validation of the RiceWrist-S, a serial robotic mechanism that facilitates rehabilitation of the forearm in pronation-supination, and of the wrist in flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation. The RiceWrist-Grip, a grip force sensing handle, is shown to provide grip force measurements that correlate well with those acquired from a hand dynamometer. Clinical validation via a single case study of incomplete spinal cord injury rehabilitation for an individual with injury at the C3-5 level showed moderate gains in clinical outcome measures. Robotic measures of movement smoothness also captured gains, supporting our hypothesis that intensive upper limb rehabilitation with the RiceWrist-S would show beneficial outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available