4.4 Article

An improved multipurpose field robot for installing construction materials

Journal

ROBOTICA
Volume 28, Issue -, Pages 945-957

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0263574710000573

Keywords

Field robot; Construction robot; Building; Glass panel; Force feedback joystick

Categories

Funding

  1. Korean Government [KRF-2008-357-D00010]
  2. MKE (The Ministry of Knowledge Economy), Korea, under the Advanced Robot Manipulation Research Center [NIPA-2010-(C7000-1001-0002)]
  3. SAMSUNG CORPORATION

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, there has been a lot of interest concerning remote-controlled robot manipulation in hazardous environments including construction sites, national defense areas, and disaster areas. However, there are problems involving the method of remote control in unstructured work environments such as construction sites. In a previous study, to address these problems, a multipurpose field robot (MFR) system was described. Though the case studies on construction, to which MFR for installing construction materials was applied, however, we found some factors to be improved. In this paper, we introduce a prototype of improved multipurpose field robot (IMFR) for construction work. This prototype robot helps a human operator easily install construction materials in remote sites through an upgraded additional module. This module consists of a force feedback joystick and a monitoring device. The human-robot interaction and bilateral communication for strategic control is also described. To evaluate the proposed IMFR, the installation of construction materials was simulated. We simulated the process of installing construction materials, in this case a glass panel. The IMFR was expected to do more accurate work, safely, at construction sites as well as at environmentally hazardous areas that are difficult for humans to approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available