4.4 Article

A cellular response linking eIF4AI activity to eIF4AII transcription

Journal

RNA
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages 1373-1384

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1261/rna.033209.112

Keywords

eIF4AI; eIF4AII; DEAD-box RNA helicase; translation; translational control; RNA helicase; hippuristanol

Funding

  1. Cole Foundation Fellowship
  2. CIHR Strategic Training Initiative in Chemical Biology
  3. Fonds de Recherche en Sante (Quebec)
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-106530]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recruitment of ribosomes to eukaryotic cellular mRNAs requires the activity of two prototypic RNA helicases, eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4AI and eIF4AII. The eIF4A isoforms are highly conserved, are thought to be functionally interchangeable, and are directed to the 59 m 7 GpppN cap structure of mRNAs during translation initiation by virtue of their assembly into eIF4F, a heterotrimeric complex that also harbors the eIF4E cap binding protein and eIF4G scaffolding unit. During the course of RNA interference experiments aimed at investigating the respective roles of eIF4AI and eIF4AII in translation, we uncovered a cellular response pathway whereby suppression of eIF4AI increases transcription of the eIF4AII gene, leading to elevated eIF4AII mRNA and protein levels. Inhibition of eIF4AI suppresses protein synthesis, and although eIF4AII protein levels increase above and beyond what should be sufficient to compensate for the decrease in eIF4AI levels, there is no corresponding rescue of translation or of the block on cellular proliferation that occurs upon eIF4AI suppression. These results were phenocopied using the small molecule eIF4A inhibitor hippuristanol. Taken together, our results indicate that eIF4AI and eIF4AII expression appear linked and that the two protein isoforms exhibit functional differences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available