4.4 Article

The role of mRNA decay in p53-induced gene expression

Journal

RNA
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages 2222-2234

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1261/rna.030122.111

Keywords

cell cycle arrest; gene expression; mRNA decay; microarray; p53 response

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. Ottawa Regional Cancer Foundation
  3. National Cancer Institute of Canada
  4. Canadian Cancer Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The p53 tumor suppressor is a DNA-damage-responsive sequence-specific transcriptional activator. The sustained activation of the p53 response is incompatible with cell growth and viability. To circumvent this issue, a variety of negative feedback loops exist to limit the duration of p53 activation. Despite our understanding of p53 regulation, very little is known about the effect of transient p53 activation on the long-term expression of p53 target genes. Here we used a temperature-sensitive variant of p53 and oligonucleotide microarrays to monitor gene expression during and following reversible p53 activation. The expression of most p53-induced transcripts was rapidly reversible, consistent with active mRNA decay. Representative 3' UTRs derived from short-lived transcripts (i.e., DDB2 and GDF15) conferred instability on a heterologous mRNA, while 3' UTRs derived from more stable transcripts (i.e., CRYAB and TP53I3) did not. The 3' UTRs derived from unstable p53-induced mRNAs were significantly longer than those derived from stable mRNAs. These 3' UTRs had high uridine and low cytosine content, leading to a higher density of U-, AU-, and GU-rich sequences. Remarkably, short-lived p53 targets were induced faster, reaching maximum transcript levels earlier than the stable p53 targets. Taken together, the evidence indicates that the p53 transcriptional response has evolved with primarily short-lived target mRNAs and that post-transcription processes play a prominent role in the p53 response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available