4.4 Article

Thermodynamic characterization of naturally occurring RNA tetraloops

Journal

RNA
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 417-429

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1261/rna.1773110

Keywords

hairpin; RNA; secondary structure; tetraloops

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R15GM085699]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although tetraloops are one of the most frequently occurring secondary structure motifs in RNA, less than one-third of the 30 most frequently occurring RNA tetraloops have been thermodynamically characterized. Therefore, 24 stem-loop sequences containing common tetraloops were optically melted, and the thermodynamic parameters Delta H-o, Delta S-o, Delta G(37)(o), and T-M for each stem-loop were determined. These new experimental values, on average, are 0.7 kcal/mol different from the values predicted for these tetraloops using the model proposed by Vecenie CJ, Morrow CV, Zyra A, Serra MJ. 2006. Biochemistry 45: 1400-1407. The data for the 24 tetraloops reported here were then combined with the data for 28 tetraloops that were published previously. A new model, independent of terminal mismatch data, was derived to predict the free energy contribution of previously unmeasured tetraloops. The average absolute difference between the measured values and the values predicted using this proposed model is 0.4 kcal/mol. This new experimental data and updated predictive model allow for more accurate calculations of the free energy of RNA stem-loops containing tetraloops and, furthermore, should allow for improved prediction of secondary structure from sequence. It was also shown that tetraloops within the sequence 5'-GCCNNNNGGC-3' are, on average, 0.6 kcal/mol more stable than the same tetraloop within the sequence 5'-GGCNNNNGCC-3'. More systemic studies are required to determine the full extent of non-nearest-neighbor effects on tetraloop stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available