4.2 Article

Pain and Personality: Do Individuals with Different Forms of Chronic Pain Exhibit a Mutual Personality?

Journal

PAIN PRACTICE
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages 486-494

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/papr.12297

Keywords

orofacial pain; psychology; temporomandibular joint dysfunction syndrome; personality; trigeminal neuropathy; temperament; character

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  2. Australian Dental Research Foundation, Inc.
  3. Early Career Researchers/New Staff grant scheme of the University of Sydney

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of personality in the experience of chronic pain is a growing field, with endless debate regarding the existence of a pain personality. This study aims to compare different chronic pain types and consolidate the existence of a common personality. Thirty-two females with chronic orofacial pain and 37 age-matched healthy females were assessed with the Temperament and Character Inventory-Revised. Chronic pain subjects had either trigeminal neuropathy (neuropathic pain) or temporomandibular disorders (nociceptive pain). This study revealed that individuals with different chronic pain types exhibit a mutual personality profile encompassing significantly higher scores in Harm Avoidance and significantly lower scores in Self-Directedness when compared to healthy subjects. In fact, this combination is associated with Cluster C personality disorders. In conclusion, our study reveals that irrespective of type, chronic pain may be associated with Cluster C personality disorders. Indeed, there has never been empirical evidence in the past to suggest that chronic pain as an overall concept is associated with any particular personality disorders. Therefore, a potential future avenue of chronic pain treatment may lie in targeting particular personality aspects and shift the target of pain-relieving treatments from sensory and psychologically state focused to psychologically trait focused.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available