4.4 Review

A turbulent decade for NSAIDs: update on current concepts of classification, epidemiology, comparative efficacy, and toxicity

Journal

RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages 1491-1502

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-011-2263-6

Keywords

Anti-inflammatory agents; non-steroidal; Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors; Comparative efficacy; Comparative safety

Categories

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Bioiberica
  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  4. Centocor
  5. Merck
  6. Novartis
  7. Pfizer
  8. Roche

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) represent a diverse class of drugs and are among the most commonly used analgesics for arthritic pain worldwide, though long-term use is associated with a spectrum of adverse effects. The introduction of cyclooxygenase-2-selective NSAIDs early in the last decade offered an alternative to traditional NSAIDs with similar efficacy and improved gastrointestinal tolerability; however, emerging concerns about cardiovascular safety resulted in the withdrawal of two agents (rofecoxib and valdecoxib) in the mid-2000s and, subsequently, in an overall reduction in NSAID use. It is now understood that all NSAIDs are associated with some varying degree of gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risk. Guidelines still recommend their use, but little is known of how patients use these agents. While strategies and guidelines aimed at reducing NSAID-associated complications exist, there is a need for evidence-based algorithms combining cardiovascular and gastrointestinal factors that can be used to aid treatment decisions at an individual patient level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available